Oral Research Report Feedback

     Becky

Class Avg

Introduction: 4.7
Method: 4.5
Results: 4.5
Delivery: 4.6
Accessible: 4.5
Visual aids: 4.4

Personal Avg

Introduction: 4.6
Method: 4.8
Results: 4.4
Delivery: 4.8
Accessible: 4.7
Visual aids: 4.8

     Becky

April 22, 2015 -

I liked the way...you did your pace

One suggestion is... to include limitations.


April 22, 2015 -

I liked the way...you did your pace

One suggestion is... to include limitations.


April 22, 2015 -

I liked the way...you did your pace

One suggestion is... to include limitations.


March 25, 2015 -

I liked the way...
you organized your implications and limitations slide.
One suggestion is...
to expand a bit on how RC interacts with math and science specifically (the practices)


March 25, 2015 -

I liked the way... you critically examined the limitations of the current study and asked some relevant questions about ways this study could have been extended. Great job describing what you found to be missing from this article.

One suggestion is... making the research design a bit more clear so we can easily determine whether the methodology allows for conclusions about causal direction or whether the relationships were correlational in nature.


March 25, 2015 -

I liked the way...you explained the relevant points of the method and outlined future research.

One suggestion is... explain how this fits into existing research.


March 25, 2015 -

I liked the way... you critically examined the limitations of the current study and asked some relevant questions about ways this study could have been extended. Great job describing what you found to be missing from this article.

One suggestion is... making the research design a bit more clear so we can easily determine whether the methodology allows for conclusions about causal direction or whether the relationships were correlational in nature.


March 25, 2015 -

I liked the way... you critically examined the limitations of the current study and asked some relevant questions about ways this study could have been extended. Great job describing what you found to be missing from this article.

One suggestion is... making the research design a bit more clear so we can easily determine whether the methodology allows for conclusions about causal direction or whether the relationships were correlational in nature.


March 25, 2015 -

I liked the way you presented results very simply but you included essence of the results. Also, you have done great job on the limitation part. You made lots of good points, I think.


March 4, 2015 -

I liked the way you had examples of items on the measures.

One suggestion is maybe use a few less words on the purpose slides.


March 4, 2015 -

I liked the way... you clearly showed visually how the results either supported or did not support the initial hypotheses.

One suggestion is... try to manage the time of your presentation to have more time for the conclusion and implications.


February 11, 2015 -

I liked the way...You broke down each of the variables nicely -- great visuals for the graph.

One suggestion is...Perhaps jumping into the analysis/results sooner, but I did enjoy hearing the background. Interesting that the demographics didn't match the national breakdown.


February 11, 2015 -

I liked the way you used smart art to get your point across! I liked the model you put about achievement/self-concept etc. I think SEM might provide some support to say "causal" though but I would triple check that.

One suggestion is to condense a bit on methods. Sometimes we can get lost in the complications.


January 21, 2015 -

I liked the way... you told the story.

One suggestion is... to build on the info you have to paint a complete picture of the delegates demographics.


January 21, 2015 -

I liked the way...you set up the introduction. It was very easy to get an understanding of the study if this wasn't your area.

One suggestion is... clarify your presentation of the method. It was a bit unclear.