Constructive Controversies

Introduction

Constructive Controversy, is a cooperative learning procedure designed to create intellectual conflict and deepen understanding of complex issues. Unlike traditional debates, however, where the goal is to ‘win’ the argument, the goal of our “Constructive Controversy” (and in science in general) is (a) to ensure a full, and critical understanding of both sides of the issue, and (b) to synthesize respective positions in a consensus statement that includes only the best and most valid arguments from all sides of an issue.

During these first two weeks, we will participate in three Constructive Controversies, at the end of which you will work with a partner to write a brief (1/2 – 1-page, or 125 – 250 word) consensus statement reporting your final position on both sides of the controversy. The final consensus statements will then be posted here.

Should schools embrace technology?

[display-frm-data id=”44790″ filter=1]

Is Rose’s research unduly influenced by his own subjectivity?

[display-frm-data id=”45124″ filter=1]

Should schools adopt a constructivist approach?

[display-frm-data id=”45133″ filter=1]